skip to main |
skip to sidebar
ROME (Catholic Online) - In an absolutely stunning announcement on the morning of October 20, 2009, the Holy See has, by Apostolic Constitution, provided the canonical vehicle for Anglican Christians to be received into full communion with the Catholic Church. Throughout the evening expectations rose throughout the world along with the fervent prayers of millions who have longed to see this day. Many Catholics have watched in prayer with hopeful, heartfelt longing for their Christian brethren in the Anglican Communion. Many Anglican Christians have suffered from the ravages of their community from within brought about by moves away from Christian orthodoxy and orthopraxy. Now,there is a way to the safe harbor of the Catholic Church.
This morning the Vatican offered a lifeline into the Ark of Peter for Anglican Christians who wish to avail themselves of the invitation.
Read the rest here. This is a historic day! Let us rejoice and praise the Lord!
.
(LifeSiteNews.com) - The Catholic Organization for Life and Family (COLF), a group co-founded by the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) and the Supreme Council of the Knights of Columbus, sent an open letter yesterday to all of Canada's MPs, urging them to vote against Bill C-384. The private members bill, brought by Bloc Quebecois MP Francine Lalonde (La Pointe-de-l'Ile), seeks to legalize euthanasia and assisted suicide.
Read the full story here.
This is definitely good news. COLF has done excellent work over the years. But the bishops cannot delegate their responsibility to teach about life issues to COLF. They need to teach it themselves by their words AND ESPECIALLY by their actions. So far, most of them aren't doing too well, judging by their handing of the Development and Peace scandal and their invitation of a dissenter to speak at their Plenary, not to mention the abortions taking place at St. Joseph's Catholic Hospital in London under the supervision and approval of a Catholic priest.
Lord help us!
.
In case you thought the Harry Potter books were harmless, think again.
.
One of Canada's Human Rights Commissions has decided to play God again. This time it's the Alberta Human Rights Commission (AHRC). It seems that nothing is beyond the reach of these kangaroo kourts. Nothing is too sacred or too logical to be questioned by these arbitrary commissions.
The latest incident involves a Catholic school teacher in Alberta that claims that she's suffering from "gender identity disorder" and that she must undergo a sex-change operation. Of course, such a rejection of the gender granted by God is a violation of Church teaching. From a purely secular standpoint, it's also a violation of plain common sense. When you have a problem of any kind, the only lasting solution comes from addressing the root of that problem. In this case, the teacher has a mental illness of some kind. Therefore, the logical and loving solution is to address the mental problem, not mutilate her body by making it look like a man.
As a result of her planned sex change, the teacher has been dismissed from the Catholic school board where she taught. She considers this to be a violation of her rights, and has filed a complaint against the school board. Unfortunately, the AHRC has accepted this complaint and will therefore hear arguments about it. The fact that they didn't reject this ridiculous complaint from the outset is very disturbing. It shows just how willing these commissions are to interfere in Church affairs.
I feel sorry for the teacher. I really do. Mental illness is not something that we should treat lightly or that we should scoff at. I have witnessed many people struggle with mental illness. It is extremely difficult to bear. Fortunately, it appears that the school board treated her kindly and respectfully when they let her go. The school board is well within its rights to decide who to employ.
The fact that the State is even considering the possibility of imposing its beliefs on the Church is extremely disturbing and intolerant. Canada is a diverse nation. It is not merely inhabited by the left wing extremists that run these commissions. These kangoroo kourts need to get in touch with reality and start being more tolerant of other peoples beliefs.
As for us Catholics, we better start moving our butts and make sure that our politicians understand that these commissions are unacceptable and violating the human rights they are supposedly intended to protect. If you don't act now, you're going to wake up someday and find out you're slave to the government's whims and fancies.
This incident also highlights the crucial fact that the true challenge for the Church in this day is to convert her own members. More damage is being inflicted on the Church in Canada today by Catholics than by any outsiders.
So before you go to bed tonight, look yourself in the mirror and ask yourself: "What concrete action will I take to propagate the true Faith within the Church?" Don't go to bed until you've made a firm commitment.
A lot of people are getting worked up about H1N1, often called the swine flu. I must admit that I'm not too worried about the virus itself. However, I am worried about the vaccine.
In normal times, a drug must undergo extensive testing, often for years, before it is allowed to be sold to the public. The H1N1 vaccine, however, has gone through these approval stages like a "drive-thru". That's not some conspiracy theory I read in the National Enquirer. It came out of the mouths of Canada's top health officials.
Last week, I was watching CBC NewsWorld. There was a press conference on the vaccine being given by the federal Health Minister, Leona Aglukkaq, and Canada's Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. David Butler-Jones. They explained that the vaccine is already in mass production with the goal of being rolled out to the public at the beginning of November. Yet, they also admitted, on two separate occasions, that the vaccine has not been approved by Health Canada and that they are still awaiting some test results about this vaccine.
Does that strike you as odd? To me, it sounds like the proverbial cart before the horses. Why would you go into mass production before the vaccine is completely tested and approved? If it turns out to be a dud, are they going to trash millions of vaccines? That's our tax dollars.
I'm surprised at the lack of media interest for this issue. The journalists at the press conference didn't seem too preoccupied by the lack of testing. On the contrary, they were more interested in knowing why the vaccine wasn't made available sooner. In the absence of proper media scrutiny, the Internet has been flooded with ridiculous conspiracy theories about how this vaccine is intentionally being designed to kill zillions of people. Give me a break. Proper testing protocols may have been skipped, but let's not go off the deep end either.
Given the lack of scientific evidence, I personally will not get vaccinated. Sorry, but you won't inject me with something that hasn't been proven safe.
I'm not giving any recommendations to anybody on this issue. You make up your own mind and don't blame me for the consequences. I'm just telling you about my apprehensions.
For the record (lest I be accused of some strange backwardness), I am totally in favour of vaccination programs when a vaccine has been proven to be safe and effective. I have no moral issues with vaccination. I think vaccines are a great progress for mankind. BUT, they have to be proven safe and effective. In my humble opinion, that hasn't been done in this case.
.
If you or someone you know is going through a crisis pregnancy, please call one of the numbers below. You will be treated with warmth, respect and care.
In Canada: call 1-800-665-0570 or leave me a comment on this blog.
In the United States: click here or call 1-800-395-HELP
No matter what your situation is, you are strong enough to make it through.
Believe in yourself!
You are not alone!
Help is available!
.
I'm honestly shocked at this story. You've gotta read this. It gives you an idea of who we're dealing with.
I cannot believe that this abortionist has had such a clear internal illumination and awareness of the real life of the unborn baby that she is destroying, and that she has even experienced an emotional attachment to the baby that she is ripping apart (to the point of crying as she performs an abortion!) and yet she continues to be unapologetic in her abortion advocacy. It's unbelievable!
In some sense, she feels pain and pity for the baby she's killing, yet she continues to do it regardless. And she expresses this internal conflict quite openly.
What a bizarre and unreal state of mind. We need to pray for these people. I think this woman is on the verge of a conversion.
Due to the high interest in our previous research regarding the approval rating of Fr. Rosica, Catholic Dialogue conducted an exhaustive enumeration of online articles related to the Development and Peace scandal.
The results show that only 10.1% of articles expressing an opinion on the issue were supportive of Development and Peace (D&P). The remaining 89.9% were critical of D&P. That's a staggering result. In a democracy, you can rarely get 89.9% of the people to agree on anything.
For the purposes of this enumeration, the articles published by the two main opposing parties of the debate were excluded. That meant leaving out close to 100 articles published by LifeSiteNews.com. It also meant excluding articles by D&P, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) or individual dioceses (note: the number of articles from LifeSiteNews far exceeds the number of articles published by D&P, the CCCB or individual dioceses). The enumeration was also limited to articles published between March 12, 2009 (when the first story about the scandal broke) and October 11, 2009. Finally, only Christian sources were considered, almost all of which were Catholic. This left more than 230 articles being published by parties that were not directly involved in the dispute.
The overwhelming disapproval rate for D&P is a serious challenge that the bishops must address at their Plenary next week in Cornwall. The vast majority of these articles were written by educated Catholics, some of them being clergy members, who applied fundamental moral teachings of the Church to the mounds of evidence compiled about D&P's partners. These are not renegades, schismatics or "ultraconservatives" (whatever that means). They are mainstream Catholics who care deeply about the health of their Church.
Let's pray that the CCCB rolls up their sleeves next week and makes some major reforms to D&P.
.
Remember that letter written by a bishop from Peru asking the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) to stop funding pro-abortion groups in their country? The Peruvian bishop was complaining that three of Development and Peace's partners were "very committed to the pro-abortion movement" in Peru. We never got a convincing response from the CCCB on that one. Just a gallon of bleach.
John Pacheco at Socon or Bust is now reporting that a bill has been tabled before the Congress in Peru to legalize abortion under some circumstances. Read his article here.
So now we have a tangible illustration of how our donation dollars can be used to advance the Culture of Death. If this bill gets passed, unborn babies will start losing their lives in Peru. And Development and Peace will have been an accomplice.
Lord, have mercy upon all of us!
.
LifeSite published an excellent article about a bishop anonymously discussing Development and Peace's funding of pro-abortion groups. This is an interesting article for a number of reasons, mostly because this bishop admits that Development and Peace is funding groups that are pro-abortion. Finally somebody comes clean!!
Yet, he doesn't think it's a big deal as long as the money is "earmarked" for projects that don't contradict Church teaching.
This approach poses a number of problems, many of which are enumerated in the article. I'll add two additional problems not covered in the article.
First, funds given to pro-aborts can be misused in ways that are extremely difficult to anticipate or even measure. Fr. Pierre Ingram, CC, who is a systematic theologian, wrote an excellent article on this matter here. He points out, among other things, that a pro-abortion group typically has a distorted understanding of life, sexuality and other moral issues. Those distortions will likely trickle into everything they do, even the programs that are supposed to be "not morally objectionable". He also explains that Catholics must not merely avoid committing evil, but must also avoid the appearance of cooperation with evil in order to not scandalize others. His article is a must read if you want to understand your faith better.
Second, the Vatican -- which is our leader and guide -- decided to stop funding UNICEF way back in 1997 precisely because the organization was pushing abortion and contraception in developing countries. UNICEF had "earmarked" programs too, by which you could theoretically target your donations to unobjectionable causes. Yet, the Vatican, being wise and astute, realized that UNICEF was not providing sufficient accountability to ensure that donations were not being used for immoral purposes. As a result, they pulled the plug on financing UNICEF. Read the official Vatican announcement here. If it's good enough for the Vatican, it's good enough for me.
Why won't our bishops just follow the Vatican's example? That's all I'm asking. Is that too much to ask?
.
OTTAWA, October 13, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - As the Bishops of Canada prepare to meet for their annual Plenary Assembly in Cornwall Ontario later this month, the International Right to Life Federation (IRTL) has written the bishops a letter regarding the recent controversy over the international development arm of the Conference - the Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace (D&P). Investigations over the past year have revealed that D&P has been funding dozens of organizations that support abortion and contraception, or otherwise undermine Catholic moral teaching.
The IRTL letter was sent to the Primate of Canada, Quebec City Cardinal Marc Ouellet.
Representing national pro-life organizations from over 170 countries, the IRTL thanks "the Canadian bishops who have prudently decided to withhold funds in the future from projects of the Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace until it has been determined that the recipients do not promote issues contrary to the teachings of the Catholic Church."
I hope the CCCB will stop denying the obvious. I only hurts their credibility with each passing day.
It's nice to see a bishop standing up for what's right. Case in point: Bishop Alexander Sample of Marquette, Michigan, blocked another bishop from giving a lecture in his diocese. Why? Because the bishop who was going to speak has dissented from Church teaching on some very important issues.
Here's what Bishop Sample had to say:
“Given Bishop Gumbleton’s very public position on certain important matters of Catholic teaching, specifically with regard to homosexuality and the ordination of women to the priesthood, it was my judgment that his presence in Marquette would not be helpful to me in fulfilling my responsibility.”
Well done, your Grace! Stand up for the Truth!
Read the full story here.
The Ottawa Citizen recently published an article where Janice Kennedy, who describes herself as a liberal Catholic, tries to explain the true causes of the sex abuse scandals in the priesthood.
Given her liberal leaning, you won't be surprised with her conclusions. She essentially says that the problem would go away if: 1) priests were allowed to marry and; 2) if women were allowed to become priests. Quite predictable and not exactly a deep revelation.
On her first point, she argues that celibacy is unnatural and fosters uncontrollable impulses. Unfortunately, this argument does not hold water. Research has shown high rates of sexual abuse among teachers, Protestant ministers and other professionals. Do you know what these groups have in common? They're allowed to marry. Consequently, the fact of having regular sexual relations with a consenting adult does appear not "cure" anybody of their pedophile tendencies.
On her second point, about women priests, is largely irrelevant to the point being discussed. How would the existence of women priests affect men's ability to control their sexual impulses? In fact, many Protestant churches report a high incidence of harassment an sexual abuse of their women ministers by the males. Moreover, about 41 percent of all sexual abuse of children in the U.S. is done by women, so they certainly are not immune to pedophilia. Ms. Kennedy's article also contains a momentous historical inaccuracy, where she claims that women priests were common in the early Church. This is totally false and unsubstantiated.
The truth is that the priesthood and the vow of celibacy are not for everybody. Jesus himself told us so (Matt 19.12). A man who feels called to the priesthood has several years of formation and discernment in which he must ask himself if he can handle the vow of celibacy. If he cannot, he should do everybody a favour and leave the seminary. It would be imprudent to assume that some miraculous transformation will occur after his ordination and that he'll suddenly be able to manage it.
The union of man and woman in sexual intercourse is meant to imitate the union of love within the Persons of the Trinity, as well as to anticipate the intimate union we will have with God in Heaven. Although the vow of celibacy may seem unnatural from a purely worldly point of view, it is entirely natural from a spiritual point of view, since it skips the intermediate "sign" of sexual union and jumps directly to the union of the soul with God, which we all hope to enjoy in the beatific vision.
I highly recommend that you read this excellent article by David Warren of the Ottawa Citizen. Mr. Warren is a Catholic convert and excellent writer.
.
The 40 Days for Life movement in Ottawa will hold a mid-point rally this Tuesday, October 13, at 6 pm. It will take place at Ground Zero (across from 65 Bank Street). Why don't you come and join us?
It is wonderful to hear that Archbishop Prendergast will be among us and will preside a Mass at 7 pm at St. Patrick's Basilica.
Thank you, your Grace, for standing with us. We love you dearly!
You can learn so much from a good homily. But it requires that you pay attention. It also requires that Father makes an effort to open up the Scriptures to the faithful.
On Friday, the first reading at the Mass was from Joel 1:13-15; 2:1-2. It goes like this:
Put on sackcloth and lament, you priests; wail, you ministers of the altar. Come, pass the night in sackcloth, you ministers of my God! Grain-offering and drink-offering are withheld from the house of your God. Sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly. Gather the elders and all the inhabitants of the land to the house of the Lord your God, and cry out to the Lord. Alas for the day! For the day of the Lord is near, and as destruction from the Almighty it comes.
Blow the trumpet in Zion; sound the alarm on my holy mountain! Let all the inhabitants of the land tremble, for the day of the Lord is coming, it is near— a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and thick darkness! Like blackness spread upon the mountains a great and powerful army comes; their like has never been from of old, or will be again after them in ages to come.
Not exactly a very cheery passage, but the Church put it in the readings for a reason.
As it happened so many times in the Old Testament, the people had strayed far away from God and had to repent. In the homily, the priest pointed out that God asks the priests to repent first. This is interesting. Why the priests first? Because as leaders of the people, the priests have a huge influence on the morals of the people. As go the priests, so goes the people.
I thought this was very relevant to our current situation, where the clergy needs to get their act together. It shows that our calls for the repentance of the bishops are very biblical and very well founded. This growing movement is not rooted in some fanaticism. It is firmly grounded in Holy Scripture.
.
LifeSiteNews.com reports that one of Development and Peace's (D&P) Mexican partners has once again demonstrated its pro-abortion activism. The organization is providing us with yet another piece of incontrovertible evidence of how our hard-earned donations are being put to work for the cause of evil. I hope the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) is paying attention.
After reading the LifeSiteNews coverage, I decided to go directly to the source, i.e. the website of the organization in question. They call themselves "Todos los Derechos Para Todos y Todas", which means "All Rights for Everyone." On their website, they just posted a document criticizing the Mexican govenrment's record on human rights. On page 10, in the sub-section called "Fighing discrimination and the rights of specific groups - Women", they denounce the lack of abortion services in some Mexican states:
"The implementation of the Official Mexican Norm 046-SSA2-200519 regulates the provision of medical services to women who are victims of sexual violence and includes the procedures that health care institutions must follow to provide interruption of pregnancy services when this [the pregnancy] is the result of a rape. The implementation of the Norm has been impeded now that reforms in the constitutions of 12 federal entities have been produced, which protect the unborn in their local constitutions."
In other words, the implementation of reforms to protect the unborn in 12 states is a violation of women's rights. This is typical rhetoric from the pro-abortion side. The report goes on to lament some instances of women not being allowed to have abortions in Guanajuato.
This is one of the "Original Five" Mexican groups that was first exposed way back in March 2009. The CCCB "investigated" this groups and found them to not be promoting abortion. I guess the CCCB didn't look too hard, eh?. What does that tell you about the CCCB's rigour? There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Now let me re-iterate that this is not some obscure secret document that LifeSite obtained in a back-alley meeting with some anonymous informant named "Deep Throat." This report is on the Internet for the whole world to see. Please click on the link and see for yourself. So don't let anybody deceive you into thinking that the evidence is not conclusive. IT IS UNDENIABLE. If anybody tries to deny it, including your local bishop, send them the link: http://www.redtdt.org.mx/media/descargables/observacionesEPUespanol.pdf
When LifeSite contacted the CCCB to explain this new evidence, they were told that the CCCB is conducting an ongoing review of Development and Peace. This is definitely good news. The fact that this review was not announced publicly leads me to believe that it isn't simply a PR move and that it might have been prompted by some outraged bishops who really care about what's going on. Let's pray that they will actually conduct the review with their eyes open this time and that the obvious will be acknowledged.
.
How can a rookie be inducted into the Hall of Fame before his rookie season is over? Obama has been in power for only 9 months. Moreover, did you know that candidates for the prize had to be submitted to the Nobel committee by February 1st? That's right, only two weeks after Obama was inaugurated as President.
There is clearly an agenda at work here, where the lefties are publicly endorsing each other like a clique. I normally wouldn't have a problem with that, except that we're dealing with the Nobel Peace Prize here. There is a huge symbolism attached to any Nobel Prize. It's like a lifetime achievement award that humanity grants to its most distinguished members. I find it very distasteful that they are manipulating this prize for politican reasons.
Distasteful isn't strong enough. I want to spit.
What's next? Will Obama be granted an honorary Gold Medal at the 100 metre dash?
Keep in mind that John Paul II, who worked so hard for peace, including helping bring down communism, was never awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Blessed Mother Teresa won the prize 1979. If you put Obama and Blessed Mother Teresa on opposite sides of a "peace" scale, which way do you think it would tilt? Is any comparison even possible?
Of note, she is quoted as saying: "the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion." Very well said. In my book, that would rule out Obama big-time.
.
Pro-abortion students at McGill University showed the true colours of the abortion movement by trying to deny authentic free speech to a pro-life speaker. As the pro-lifer was trying to give a presentation, these students invaded the speaking area and drowned out the speaker with shouts and songs. So much for "choice". They wouldn't even let the other side speak. Watch the spectacle here. Honestly, they look like school children and not adults.
In recent years, we've seen pro-abortion students at several other Canadian universities try to silence pro-lifers through coercion, so this behaviour is not surprising.
However, there is an original twist to this incident. To their credit, McGill University authorities realized that freedom of speech is essential at a university, so they called the police. A representative of the university addressed the protesters at about 3:45 of the video and asked them to let the speaker make his presentation. The police officer then politely but firmly laid down the law at about 4:15, notably by telling them that if they didn't leave in 5 minutes they would be arrested and removed.
Some students chose not to obey and the police removed them. However, the police eventually left, even though many students kept disrupting the presentation. The cops didn't fulfill their obligations fully in this case. As for the university's own security guards, they were completely useless. They were unwilling to do anything. So what's the point of these guards?
I feel sorry for these students. Their reputations are forever tarnished. If you were an employer, would you hire a person who doesn't believe in freedom of speech and decency? Do you think they would be conducive to a respectful and constructive work environment? As a manager who has done dozens of interviews over the years, I tell you that you shouldn't touch such a person with a 10-foot pole.
As for the police, I'm disappointed (but not surprised) that they chickened out.
The pro-aborts have done us a favour by showing how intolerant they are and how unsympathetic their position is. If they held a legitimate position that could be defended with reasonable arguments, do you think they'd behave like this? They know that they just can't rival pro-life arguments. They're afraid that the truth be known because then the gravity of abortion will be exposed. Consequently, their only hope is to silence debate.
As I've said before, student associations should not be involved in politics. That's not their purpose. If students like political life, they should do it outside the university like the rest of us.
Please pray for the conversion of these students.
I read this article in the Globe and Mail today entitled "Church vocal in face of scandal". Here are some quotes that caught my attention.
This time – with the disgrace of former bishop Raymond Lahey drenching the news media – the hierarchy of Canada's Roman Catholic Church has not stayed silent.
In what one senior church official on Thursday called a light-years' shift from a generation ago, bishops have preached in their cathedrals and written open letters about their anger and disgust with Rev. Lahey and the child pornography charges he faces.
The national Catholic television station Salt and Light TV has devoted much of its blog to the story. And the Pope's representative in Canada this week told theology students in Toronto that the Canadian church had been wounded.
(...)
The Canadian bishops were the first in the world to institute protocols, Father Rosica said. It placed them far ahead of the U.S. church and fostered a climate of transparency, rigorous investigation and instant suspension for suspected wrongdoing. Except, as the papal nuncio told theology students, the destructive power of sin can't be underestimated.
First of all, I'm very happy that the Canadian bishops have been so vocal in denouncing Archbishop Lahey's actions. This is another sad episode in the history of our Church, but the truth must be known and dealt with. There would have been no point in denying it or minimizing it.
What bugs me is that the bishops have started patting themselves on the back over how awesomely they have dealt with this issue. Their tone is quite triumphalist, at a time when there is nothing to be triumphant about. We just caught an Archbishop using child porn! Not to mention that it wasn't the bishops who brought this man to justice, but rather the police who did an excellent job. I think the bishops' attitude is severely misplaced and very premature. New facts about this case are still emerging. This is a time of repentance, investigation and accountability, not a time for self-flattery.
This is particularly true in light of the new revelations that Lahey's child pornography behaviour was known by another priest and bishop 20 years ago!
Indeed, in the National Post, we read that Father Kevin Molloy learned about Lahey's behaviour in 1989. He confronted Lahey and told him to stop these sinful deeds. He also alerted Archbishop Alphonsus Penney, who was the proper ecclesiastical authority at the time. Archbishop Penney has not spoken to the media yet concerning the Lahey scandal, so we don't know exactly what measures, if any, were taken against Lahey in 1989. But one thing is certain: Lahey's child pornography habits were obviously not overcome at that time and it would have been horribly imprudent to let him continue his ministry in that condition. Archbishop Penney owes us a darn good explanation. Until then, the bishops would be advised to hold off on their self-congratulation.
The same article in the National Post says that Lahey allegedly was in the habit of bringing some boys into his home on weekends, back in the 1980s. That's where some boys found the child pornography.
This raises the obvious question: why was Lahey allowed to continue in his functions for another 20 years after being exposed?
Keep in mind that 1989 was not so long ago. Our understanding of sexual deviancy had improved a lot since the 1950s or 1960s. Disciplinary actions for sexual deviancy in the clergy should have been stronger.
So while normal Catholics are still in shock and seeking accountability, the bishops are congratulating themselves in one of Canada's national newspapers. How does that make you feel? I'm concerned that the Canadian bishops are more worried about their public appearance over this scandal than in addressing the substance of the issue. Dealing with the issue of sexual deviancy in the clergy is difficult and requires great sacrifice. It's a lot easier to focus on the PR. But we can't let them be content with a PR campaign. We need some answers and accountability.
Reading the quote from Fr. Rosica above, you'd almost think that the Canadian Church has it all figured out and that sexual scandals are a thing of the past. Well, no. The fact that an Archbishop can still fall through the cracks tells me that there is much work left to do. We need the bishops to tell us what concrete measures they will implement to prevent this from happening again.
Is this a sign of more things to come from the CCCB's revamped communications strategy? I sure hope not.
Please pray for our bishops.
Many of you are aware of the Father Rosica scandal that erupted over the past month. You can read about it here.
Catholic Dialogue was interested in getting a broader sense of how Internet-literate Catholics were reacting to Fr. Rosica's unexplainable outburst. To do this, we conducted extensive research on the Internet in order to see which way the wind was blowing. Today, we are presenting these exclusive results.
Clearly, Fr. Rosica is facing serious headwinds in the court of public opinion.
The research revealed that 80.5% of all the articles that expressed an opinion on the controversy were opposed to Fr. Rosica's position, while only 19.5% supported him. The methodology encompasses all online articles published on the Fr. Rosica controversy, but excludes "comments" posted on blogs, since these can easily be manipulated.
In case you're wondering, articles by LifeSiteNews represented a very small fraction of the articles published on this issue. Excluding articles from LifeSiteNews, the disapproval rating for Fr. Rosica is still 79.8%.
The disapproval of Fr. Rosica is widespread and broad-based. It includes both men and women, laity and clergy. They quote Church documents and Doctors of the Church. They refer to authoritative statements by Vatican officials. By all accounts, these are educated Catholics, well-versed in Scripture and the Catechism. They do not seek personal glory or satisfaction. They do not have any axe to grind. They are merely seeking to denounce errors and injustices so that the Church in Canada may once again submit to Rome's authority.
In theological terms, we'd say that the sensus fidelium is enabling the faithful to participate in Christ's prophetic office by denouncing error. In layman's terms, we'd say that Fr. Rosica's behaviour doesn't pass the sniff test.
This doesn't bode well for Salt and Light's ratings. But it is certainly good news in the battle for the soul of the Church, since the Internet reaches such a broader audience than a satellite cable network.
The winds of change are blowing. There is a growing sense that too many clergymen are lukewarm or outright dissenters. The discontent among the faithful will be a powerful instrument to help the Church return to authentic Magisterial teaching in union with the Vatican.
Please pray for Fr. Rosica and all clergy.
Just a quick note to thank Archbishop Prendergast of Ottawa for participating in the Life Chain this past weekend.
We admire your dedication to the cause of life and we rejoice to have you stand by our side on the front lines.
May God bless you!
The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB) caused quite a stir when they invited a dissenter to give two talks at their plenary assembly from October 19 to 23. The outcry was so bad, that the CCCB asked the theologian in question, Richard Gaillardetz, to publicly explain the controversial views that he holds.
In a series of posts, starting with this one, John Pacheco convincingly exposes Gaillardetz's errors and his obscure attempts at deceiving people that he is a faithful Catholic. Gaillardetz's article was merely damage control, and Pacheco was not deceived. He called upon the expertise of two renowned theologians who confirm that Gaillardetz is indeed in defiance of Church teaching in many respects.
So, dear bishops, the ball is in your court. Why have you invited this man? Will you un-invite him in order to avoid confusing and scandalizing the faithful?
Dear readers: if you care about your Church and your bishops, you should ask your local bishop why they are inviting a dissenter to give them two lectures.
Disturbing news from the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops (CCCB). It goes like this:
1. In the spring of 2009, LifeSite and many other pro-life groups uncovered the names of about 40 pro-abortion groups in developing countries being funded by Development and Peace, the CCCB's official charity.
2. In June 2009, the CCCB issued a whitewash denial without addressing any evidence. They also chastized LifeSite for not engaging in "dialogue" with the bishops, even though LifeSite had sought to discuss the evidence with the bishops and Development and Peace before going public (they were brushed aside).
3. In July 2009, in response to the CCCB's request for more "dialogue", LifeSite offered to make a 15-minute presentation to the bishops at their plenary in mid-October.
4. On September 25, the CCCB denied LifeSite's request.
Now tell me, dear reader, how is one supposed to react to this apparently false overture for dialogue on the part of the CCCB?
The episcopacy is a fundamental institution of the Catholic Church. We cannot survive without it. However, many of the current incumbents aren't doing their job. We desperately need them to return to Rome's teaching. There are good bishops in this country. We need them to speak up, lest the flock be totally disoriented and lost.
